Useless Knowledge (Thoreau and Newman)

Knowledge, according to the Websters New Universal Unabridged Dictionary is delimitate as A clear and certain perception of something; the act, incident, or state of knowing; understanding. Knowledge is something everyone possesses, granted some evince more intimacy than some others and it forms itself in some a(prenominal) opposite shipway however nonetheless, everyone has some sort of knowledge. Knowledge is something bulk drill in everyday life from waking up and get ready for the day to taking a sieve or completing daily duties in the office. However, everything people cast in one case carryed may not be used in everyday life, therefore is it fair to presuppose that useless knowledge exists? After reading a check of pieces from two scarce philosophers, one world Henry David Thoreau in Walking and the other being John Henry Newman in The Uses of Knowledge I believe that useless knowledge exists in the world. While Thoreau illustrates his ideas to the ref thro ugh images of nature and our surroundings in life, Newman illustrates his perspectives in a lecture format.

Through their works, both authors figure of knowledge as a rather useless and remote asset in order to succeed in life, which supports the descent that humans learn as they grow and interact, more so than when they sit toilet a desk for nine months out of the social physique while being lectured to in what seems like a alien language.         How many students at Saint Marys College would really resign seminar class if it wasnt forced upon them in order to graduate? The answer is obvious, and the fact is that not many students if an! y at all would take the class. However, this seems awkward since many studies from the college show that seniors who have graduated in years other(prenominal) loved seminar and have labeled it as their deary class. If you sine qua non to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper