Jurors exit vote with their hearts, and then find the legal come to hang their emotions on, a law professor advised me well-nigh 20 years ago. In other linguistic communication, rather than basing their decisions on the law, jurors vote according to their feelings - and then decide the law they go out use to justify that decision. Perhaps the reason so legion(predicate) people were outraged by the O.J. Simpson sequel was because it was such a blatant example of his theory. I have always remembered his words and wield them in the forefront of my mind as I military service clients map out strategies for the courtroom. So when Im called in to assist on a project, my first question is: What is the accounting? Im looking for a story to tell the jurors which will emotionally connect them to my clients berth. nevertheless what happens more often than non, instead of acquiring a story, I get the law. An Inheritance Case: The Plaintiffs chronicle For instance, in a case involv ing an elderly woman suing the family of her gentleman friend for deviate of his estate, I was informed the case was closely a oral contract. The plaintiff claimed that she had been the old mans caretaker for 10 years and that he had promised to financially compensate her in his will for her services . But he had left his estate to his family, instead. A new will, bequeathing her $100,000, had been drafted, but not signed.
Plaintiff had to prove in that respect had been an agreement and she should be compensated. Okay, I replied, But what is the story? Three hours later, after(prenominal) asking what seemed at t imes to my client to be irrelevant, slow an! d exasperating questions, I got the answer to my initial query. The story was about Eloise, well compose essay, it made me view things differently then before. i peculiarly liked the conclusion. If you want to get a sound essay, entrap it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper