Useless Knowledge (Thoreau and Newman)

Knowledge, according to the Websters New Universal Unabridged Dictionary is define as A clear and certain perception of something; the act, occurrence, or state of knowing; understanding. Knowledge is something everyone possesses, granted some add more intimacy than some others and it forms itself in some a(prenominal) divergent shipway however nonetheless, everyone has some sort of knowledge. Knowledge is something mickle drill in everyday life from waking up and get ready for the day to taking a shield or completing daily duties in the office. However, everything people shoot in one case carryed may not be used in everyday life, therefore is it fair to ordain that useless knowledge exists? After reading a couple on of pieces from two scarce philosophers, one world Henry David Thoreau in Walking and the other being John Henry Newman in The Uses of Knowledge I believe that useless knowledge exists in the world. While Thoreau illustrates his ideas to the ref thro ugh images of nature and our surroundings in life, Newman illustrates his perspectives in a lecture format.

Through their works, both authors remember of knowledge as a rather useless and digressive asset in order to succeed in life, which supports the contestation that humans learn as they grow and interact, more so than when they sit toilet a desk for nine months out of the year while being lectured to in what seems like a international language.         How many students at Saint Marys College would really defer seminar grad if it wasnt forced upon them in order to graduate? The answer is obv ious, and the fact is that not many students! if any at all would take the class. However, this seems awkward since many studies from the college show that seniors who have graduated in years other(prenominal) loved seminar and have labeled it as their preferent class. If you sine qua non to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper